Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Network Blinds Direct

See the evidence from Neil Entwistle trial in our photo gallery and video footage

View Video
Download Video

Video

See the evidence gathered during the course of the Entwistle double murder trial
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
27 June 2008
WORKSOP Guardian Chief Reporter Debbie Lockett examines the evidence in the Neil Entwistle trial.
The media were given exclusive access to the haul gathered in the wake of the killings of Rachel and Lillian Entwistle.

Amongst the evidence is a note penned by Neil Entwistle in which he writes of his love for Rachel - in the past tense.

He tells of how he and Rachel 'had no secrets'. He talks of trust, suggesting the trust between he and his wife 'continued to grow stronger'.

He says of Rachel: "She had a natural gift of being able to read people...it was impossible to fool her."

"If she spent any time with you, it was because she knew what a good person you are."

Also amongst the evidence is a photo of the bed in which little Lillian was shot by Entwistle. During the course of the trial, Entwistle was heard saying he 'saw bubbles' coming from Lillian's mouth as she lay dying.

Prosecutors insist he saw the bubbles because he shot the nine-month-old girl at point blank range before shooting Rachel in the head.

He, and his mother and father - Yvonne and Cliff Entwistle - claim Rachel killed her baby, before turning her father-in-law's gun on herself.

After the trial, Yvonne Entwistle said she 'knew Rachel was depressed'. The defence did not offer up this notion as evidence during the trial.

You can also see photos of Rachel and Lillian, one of which is taken from the computer screensaver. That computer was later found to have a trail of sordid activity in its memory.

It showed someone had trawled the web in search of ways to kill someone with a knife. It also revealed the user 'ENT' had a penchant for female escorts as well as sex swinger and dating sites.

To see the dramatic photos of the evidence, click to enter our photo gallery.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 June 2008 11:12 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Worksop
 
Prev
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1

,

27/06/2008 15:12:11
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
2

HerWeGoAgain,

27/06/2008 15:19:45
In terms of the killing weapon: why didn't the prosecution have to prove how it got in the home and when it got in the home? What about the gunshot residue found on the frong and back of both of R's hands? That was evidence too. It suggested suicide. Why weren't the standard tests done on R's wrists, and arms (clothing)? The tests are required in an unbiased investigation. (evidence). Why didn't the ME follow established protocol and investigate suicide given the GSR on R's hands. (evidence)? Why was there no evidence linking NE to shooting a gun, if this were a homicide? (evidence) And so much more. Why do people assume that a loving mother could not kill her child but a loving, doting dad could. So many questions. Again, a portion of this story is the quality of the media coverage.
3

,

27/06/2008 15:52:34
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
4

,

27/06/2008 16:30:00
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
5

,

28/06/2008 08:11:52
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
6

,

08/07/2008 17:49:31
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
7

,

08/07/2008 20:10:07
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
8

,

08/07/2008 20:18:03
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
9

,

08/07/2008 20:25:25
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
10

,

09/07/2008 11:11:30
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
Prev
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 

Today's Vote

Do you think crime is out of control in Worksop?
Yes - I live in fear every day
No - it's just a minority and the police do a good job


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.